Impact of Total Coronary Occlusion on Long-term Outcomes in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Article information

Clin Exp Thromb Hemost. 2024;9(2):27-34
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 November 10
doi : https://doi.org/10.14345/ceth.23003
1Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
2Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
3Department of Cardiology, Gwangju Veterans Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
*Corresponding author: Myung Ho Jeong, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA, FESC, FSCAI, FAPSIC, Principal Investigator of the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61469, Korea Tel: +82-62-220-6243 Fax: +82-62-228-7174 E-mail: myungho6243@gmail.com
Received 2024 August 29; Revised 2024 October 31; Accepted 2024 November 5.

Trans Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the impact of preprocedural total coronary occlusion on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era.

Methods

Of 13,707 patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health database, 2,920 consecutive patients with STEMI having single-vessel disease within 48 hours of symptom onset who underwent primary PCI were categorized by preprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade: 0 (n = 1,966), I or II (n = 583), and III (n = 371). Co-primary outcomes were all-cause death and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular event (MACCE) at 3 years.

Results

Patients with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 were more likely to have longer symptom-to-door time, higher body weight, higher Killip class, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher peak troponin I, and lower postprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 (94.5% vs. 100%, P < 0.001) compared to those with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality (8.1% in TIMI 0 vs. 5.9% in TIMI 3, log-rank P = 0.161) and MACCE (14.1% vs. 13.7%, log-rank P = 0.931) between the two groups. In a Cox time-to-event multivariable model with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 as the reference, the preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 was not independently associated with mortality or MACCE.

Conclusion

In a nationwide prospective Korean registry, total coronary occlusion before PCI was not associated with worse clinical outcomes at 3 years in patients with STEMI and single-vessel disease when treated with primary PCI.

Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction is commonly classified as either ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI to identify patients who will benefit from rapid reperfusion therapy [1]. There has been a consistent need to develop methods that can identify patients with STEMI early who are at risk of subsequent adverse events that might be reduced by personalized adjunctive therapies. Pathophysiologically, STEMI results from acute coronary occlusion associated with transmural myocardial ischemia. However, the coronary artery is not completely occluded in more than one-third of patients with STEMI [2-4]. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade was established to assess the coronary perfusion associated with the degree of coronary obstruction [5]. Previous studies regarding the prognostic value of low preprocedural TIMI flow grade in patients with STEMI have shown conflicting results [6-9]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis involving 40,777 patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction suggested that patients with a totally occluded culprit vessel on coronary angiography are at higher risk of mortality and major adverse cardiac events [10]. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the impact of preprocedural total coronary occlusion on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with STEMI in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era using data from a large, prospective, nationwide Korean registry.

Methods

Study population

The Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) was designed to evaluate real-world practice and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with AMI between November 2011 and December 2015. The 20 tertiary university hospitals having facilities for PCI and onsite cardiac surgery consecutively enrolled patients. Data about baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, and cardiovascular outcomes were collected online by a clinical research coordinator. Out of 13,707 patients enrolled in the KAMIR-NIH, 6,366 consecutive patients diagnosed with STEMI within 48 hours of symptom onset were identified. Patients who had been treated with thrombolysis, had a symptom-to-door time (S2DT) > 48 hours, did not receive primary PCI, had multivessel disease, or were lost to follow-up at 6 months were excluded (Fig. 1). Consequently, a total of 2,920 patients with STEMI (60.8 ± 12.8 years; men, 80.1%) were analyzed and categorized into preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 (n = 1,966), preprocedural TIMI flow grade 1-2 (n = 583), or preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 (n = 371). PCI was performed according to standard guidelines. All patients received loading doses of aspirin (300 mg) and a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, 600 mg; ticagrelor, 180 mg; prasugrel, 60 mg), followed by corresponding maintenance doses for at least 1 year. Adjunctive drugs to support PCI, thrombus aspiration, and the use of intravascular imaging were left to the physician’s discretion. Medications such as statins, beta-blockers, and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system blockers were prescribed as per the guidelines. The completeness of follow-up at 3 years ( ≥ 1,005 days) was 93.3% (2,725/2,920). The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of each participating center. The present study was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Fig. 1.

Study flowchart. The study population was derived from the nationwide prospective KAMIR-NIH (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health). MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non-STsegment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; S2DT, symptom-to-door time; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Outcomes and definition

The co-primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE; a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization by PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting, and nonfatal stroke) at 3 years. The secondary outcomes were individual components of MACCE at 3 years. All clinical events were identified via interview, chart review, or phone call by trained clinical research coordinators and confirmed by the principal investigator of each hospital. All data were collected in a web-based case report form. STEMI was diagnosed based on the presence of a new ST-segment elevation ≥ 0.1 mV in ≥ 2 contiguous leads ( ≥ 0.2 mV in V2 to V3 leads) or a new left bundle branch block with a concomitant elevated cardiac marker. Primary PCI was defined as when the procedure was performed as soon as possible after the diagnosis of STEMI in the index hospitalization. Off-hour admission was defined as arrival at the hospital during weekends, holidays, and night shifts (6 PM to 8 AM) on weekdays. The PCI was considered successful when residual stenosis was < 30% with final TIMI flow grade 2 or 3. Potent P2Y12 inhibitors included ticagrelor and prasugrel.

Statistical analysis

Analyses were performed using R software version 4.1.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Categorical and continuous variables are presented as the number of cases (percentages) and mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range), respectively. The categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and continuous variables were compared using one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal‒Wallis test. Kaplan‒Meier analysis of the outcomes according to the groups was performed using the log-rank test. Correlates of clinical outcomes were assessed using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Baseline variables with P < 0.1 in the univariable analysis and any other baseline variables judged to be of clinical relevance from previously published studies were included in the multivariable analysis after considering the assumption of proportionality and linearity of the Cox proportional hazards model. Specifically, these variables comprised preprocedural TIMI flow grade, age, sex, body weight, symptom-do-door time, off-hour presentation, Killip class, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, angina, previous myocardial infarction or revascularization, family history of premature coronary artery disease, current smoker status, previous cerebrovascular accident, anemia, creatinine clearance, total cholesterol, white blood cell count, and left anterior descending artery stenosis. The following variables with missing values were included in the multivariable analysis: systolic blood pressure (n = 6), heart rate (n = 6), body weight (n = 73), hemoglobin (n = 4), creatinine clearance (n = 4), and total cholesterol (n = 92). Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation method. The assumptions of proportionality and linearity were assessed using the log-minus-log plots and the cumulative sum of martingale-based residuals, respectively. Collinearity diagnostics were assessed using the variance inflation factor and eigensystem analysis among variables included in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics

Compared with patients with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3, those with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 were more likely to have longer S2DT, high body weight, high Killip class at admission, low left ventricular ejection fraction, high white blood cell count, high peak troponin I, and high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (Table 1). Patients with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 were more likely to have shorter door-to-balloon time, right coronary artery culprit lesion, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion type B2/C, thrombus aspiration, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use; they were less likely to have stenting, drug-eluting stent implantation, and postprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 (Table 2). There were no significant differences in medications at discharge among the groups.

Baseline clinical and laboratory findings according to preprocedural TIMI flow grades

Angiographic and procedural characteristics and medical treatments according to preprocedural TIMI flow grades

Clinical outcomes

Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3 years (1,095 days; interquartile range: 1,057−1,095). Table 3 shows clinical outcomes up to 3 years according to preprocedural TIMI flow. There were no significant differences among the three groups regarding primary and secondary outcomes during the 3-year follow-up: 3.2% in preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 vs. 2.9% in preprocedural TIMI flow grade 1 or 2 vs. 2.7% in preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 for in-hospital mortality, P = 0.876; 8.1% vs. 7.9% vs. 5.9% for all-cause mortality at 3 years, P = 0.346, log-rank P = 0.161; and 14.1% vs. 15.1% vs. 13.7% for MACCE at 3 years, P = 0.795, log-rank P = 0.931. The cumulative time-to-event curves for all-cause mortality and MACCE among the three groups based on preprocedural TIMI flow grades over 3 years are shown in Fig. 2. For sensitivity analysis, Kaplan–Meier curves were generated for all-cause mortality and MACCE according to preprocedural TIMI flow grades in patients undergoing stenting or having postprocedural TIMI flow grade 3, which revealed no significant results (Online Fig. 1).

Clinical outcomes during 3 years according to preprocedural TIMI flow grades

Fig. 2.

Cardiovascular outcomes during 3 years according to the preprocedural TIMI flow grades. Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) all-cause mortality and (B) major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE) during 3 years. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TIMI, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction.

Clinical significance of total coronary occlusion

In a Cox time-to-event multivariable regression analysis with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 as the reference, preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 was not independently associated with increased incidence of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.57; P = 0.996) or MACCE (adjusted HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.14; P = 0.271) at 3 years (Fig. 3). The results of the stepwise Cox proportional hazard models for correlates of all-cause mortality and MACCE are presented in Online Tables 1 and 2, respectively. We performed several subgroup analyses to ensure the robustness of the results, which are based on the TIMI risk score, S2DT < 4 hours or ≥ 4 hours, infarct related artery, and another high-risk factors (Online Figs 2 to 5). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality or MACCE at 3 years in the subgroup analyses.

Fig. 3.

Adjusted prognostic values of variables for 3-year mortality and MACCE. Cox regression analysis using the enter method was performed with preprocedural TIMI flow grades and remaining variables in a backward elimination selection. CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MACCE, major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events; WBC, white blood cell. Other abbreviations as in Fig.1.

Discussion

In a large, nationwide, prospective Korean registry, patients with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 were more likely to be obese and have longer S2DT, higher Killip class, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher peak troponin I, and lower postprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 compared to those with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3. Kaplan‒Meier analysis showed no significant difference in all-cause death or MACCE between the two groups. In a Cox time-to-event multivariable model with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 as the reference, preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 was not independently associated with mortality or MACCE at 3 years. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest observational study to investigate the impact of a preprocedural total coronary occlusion on long-term cardiovascular outcomes among all-comer STEMI patients with single-vessel disease in the contemporary PCI era.

Although the majority of patients with STEMI have a preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 at the time of coronary angiography, approximately one in three patients with STEMI presenting within 12 hours of symptom onset have a preprocedural TIMI flow grade other than 0 [2-4,11]. Theoretically, patients with STEMI and preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 may have worse clinical outcomes associated with larger and more irreversible infarction compared with those with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 1-3. However, there have been conflicting results regarding the prognostic value of low preprocedural TIMI flow. Stone et al. analyzed 2,507 patients with acute myocardial infarction from the four Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trials and demonstrated that patients with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 had significantly lower rates of inhospital mortality, new-onset heart failure, and 6-month mortality compared with those without preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 [6]. Preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 was an independent determinant of survival in the multivariable analysis. Luca et al. analyzed 1,791 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty and demonstrated that preprocedural TIMI flow grade was related to postprocedural TIMI flow grade 3, enzymatic infarct size, predischarge ejection fraction, and one-year mortality. Multivariable analysis revealed that preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 was an independent predictor of one-year survival in high-risk patients [7]. Recently, Bauer analyzed 1,680 patients with STEMI within 6 hours of symptom onset from the ATLANTIC (Administration of Ticagrelor in the Cath Lab or in the Ambulance for New ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction to Open the Coronary Artery) study and demonstrated that a preprocedural TIMI flow grade < 3 was not an independent predictor of major adverse ischemic events within 30 days [8].

Our study analyzed 2,920 consecutive patients with STEMI and single coronary artery stenosis within 48 hours of symptom onset from a nationwide prospective Korean registry for which the recent guidelines recommend primary PCI [12]. Preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 was not independently associated with an increased incidence of all-cause mortality or MACCE at 3 years, even in diverse high-risk subpopulations such as TIMI risk score ≥ 4, S2DT ≥ 4 hours, left anterior descending artery stenosis, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, and low ejection fraction. Several explanations may account for the negative association between preprocedural total occlusion and clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI. First, compared with previous studies, patients enrolled in the present study had shorter S2DT (125 minutes, interquartile range: 60‒271) and door-to-balloon time (58 minutes, interquartile range: 46‒72), and more than 90% of patients received stenting, mainly drug-eluting stents. The rate of successful PCI was relatively high at 98.7%. Second, we should consider the natural course of coronary occlusion when interpreting the prognosis of preprocedural TIMI flow grade on clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI. Coronary occlusion may have a stuttering course with intermittent occlusion and re-canalization [13]. Therefore, pre-procedural TIMI flow grades at the time of coronary angiography may be the one of the diverse flow grades during the stuttering course. Third, the survivor cohort effect should be considered when patients with STEMI were analyzed because they have already survived the period at the highest risk of death. In a previous study, late presentation was not independently associated with an increased incidence of mortality after STEMI, which is partly explained by the survivor cohort effect [4]. Patients with a totally occluded culprit artery may be more likely to die before arriving at the hospital arrival, resulting in an attenuation of its impact of it on clinical outcomes.

Another issue we should consider is the appropriateness of TIMI flow grade as a measure of coronary circulation. The TIMI Coronary Grade Flow grade was initially established by the TIMI study group in the early 1980s to provide a uniform method of documenting epicardial perfusion on coronary arteriography. It has proven to be an effective clinical tool [14]. TIMI flow grade 0 represents a total occlusion and TIMI flow grade 3 represents normal perfusion. It is certainly easy and inexpensive, but it might be a suboptimal, incomplete measure of myocardial flow [15]. TIMI frame count, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade, and microvascular resistance index have been suggested as better measures of myocardial flow in patients with STEMI [16,17]. The corrected TIMI frame count is the number of cine frames required for the dye to first reach standardized distal coronary landmarks [18]. A faster 90-minute corrected TIMI frame count was shown to be related to improved 1-month clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration in a multivariate model. TIMI myocardial perfusion grade was developed to assess the filling and clearance of contrast in the myocardium [19]. The TIMI myocardial perfusion grade is related to a 30-day mortality risk after the administration of thrombolytic drugs. Even among patients having TIMI flow grade 3, the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades allowed further risk stratification. The microcirculatory resistance index has been suggested as a measure of the coronary microcirculation [20]. A previous study involving 29 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI demonstrated that the microcirculatory resistance index correlated significantly with myocardial infarct size, whereas other microcirculation measures, such as ST-segment resolution, TIMI frame count, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade, and coronary flow reserve, did not [21].

Study limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, the KAMIR-NIH participating centers are all tertiary university hospitals with a higher patient volume, thus limiting the generalizability of the present findings. Second, we only included patients with STEMI and single obstructive coronary artery. It is also one of the strengths of our study to avoid bias associated with multivessel coronary disease and related procedures, which might not be addressed appropriately in the registry. Third, adjudication of the TIMI flow grades was performed by investigators at each participating centers without core laboratory confirmation.

Conclusions

In a large, nationwide, prospective Korean registry, STEMI patients with TIMI flow grade 0 on coronary angiography were more likely to have longer S2DT, higher body weight, higher Killip class, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher peak troponin I, and lower postprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 compared to those with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3. However, in a Cox time-to-event multivariable model with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 as the reference, the preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 was not independently associated with mortality or MACCE at 3 years in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI.

Notes

The authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Funding

This work was funded by the Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016‒ER6304‒02) and the Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute (BCRI‒22052).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients and investigators who participated in this registry. The present study was conducted in accordance with the STROBE statement.

References

1. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:959–69.
2. Karwowski J, Gierlotka M, Gąsior M, Poloński L, Ciszewski J, Bęćkowski M, et al. Relationship between in-farct artery location, acute total coronary occlusion, and mortality in STEMI and NSTEMI patients. Pol Arch Intern Med 2017;127:401–11.
3. Schamroth Pravda N, Cohen T, Klempfner R, Kornowski R, Beigel R, Orvin K, et al. Temporal trends in the pre-procedural TIMI flow grade among patients with ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction - From the ACSIS registry. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2021;36:100868.
4. Cho KH, Han X, Ahn JH, Hyun DY, Kim MC, Sim DS, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with late presentation of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:1859–1870.
5. Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R, Borer J, Cohen LS, Dalen J, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987;76:142–54.
6. Stone GW, Cox D, Garcia E, Brodie BR, Morice MC, Griffin J, et al. Normal flow (TIMI-3) before mechanical reperfusion therapy is an independent determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials. Circulation 2001;104:636–41.
7. De Luca G, Ernst N, Zijlstra F, van ‘t Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, Dambrink JH, et al. Preprocedural TIMI flow and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1363–7.
8. Bauer T, Zeymer U, Diallo A, Vicaut E, Bolognese L, Cequier A, et al. Impact of preprocedural TIMI flow on clinical outcome in low-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the ATLANTIC study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020;95:494–500.
9. Hashimoto T, Ako J, Nakao K, Ozaki Y, Kimura K, Noguchi T, et al. Pre-procedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int Heart J 2018;59:920–5.
10. Khan AR, Golwala H, Tripathi A, Bin Abdulhak AA, Bavishi C, Riaz H, et al. Impact of total occlusion of culprit artery in acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2017;38:3082–9.
11. Schömig A, Ndrepepa G, Kastrati A. Late myocardial salvage: time to recognize its reality in the reperfusion therapy of acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1900–7.
12. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119–77.
13. Rivas F, Cobb FR, Bache RJ, Greenfield JC Jr. Relationship between blood flow to ischemic regions and extent of myocardial infarction. Serial measurement of blood flow to ischemic regions in dogs. Circ Res 1976;38:439–47.
14. Dalen JE, Gore JM, Braunwald E, Borer J, Goldberg RJ, Passamani ER, et al. Six- and twelve-month follow-up of the phase I Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:179–85.
15. Yildiz M, Henry TD. Preprocedure Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade: has its time come and gone. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020;95:501–2.
16. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Marble SJ, Barron HV, Braunwald E. Relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades, flow grades, frame count, and percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term outcomes after thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002;105:1909–13.
17. Yong ASC, Fearon WF. Assessing the coronary microcirculation in patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009828.
18. Gibson CM, Murphy SA, Rizzo MJ, Ryan KA, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, et al. Relationship between TIMI frame count and clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group. Circulation 1999;99:1945–50.
19. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Ryan KA, Mesley R, Marble SJ, et al. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation 2000;101:125–30.
20. Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, Caffarelli AD, Robbins RC, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 2003;107:3129–32.
21. Fearon WF, Shah M, Ng M, Brinton T, Wilson A, Tremmel JA, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:560–5.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Study flowchart. The study population was derived from the nationwide prospective KAMIR-NIH (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health). MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non-STsegment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; S2DT, symptom-to-door time; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Fig. 2.

Cardiovascular outcomes during 3 years according to the preprocedural TIMI flow grades. Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) all-cause mortality and (B) major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE) during 3 years. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TIMI, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction.

Fig. 3.

Adjusted prognostic values of variables for 3-year mortality and MACCE. Cox regression analysis using the enter method was performed with preprocedural TIMI flow grades and remaining variables in a backward elimination selection. CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MACCE, major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events; WBC, white blood cell. Other abbreviations as in Fig.1.

Table 1.

Baseline clinical and laboratory findings according to preprocedural TIMI flow grades

Overall (n = 2,920) Preprocedural TIMI Flow 0 (n = 1,966) Preprocedural TIMI Flow 1 or 2 (n = 583) Preprocedural TIMI Flow 3 (n = 371) P value*
Demographics
 Age (yr) 60.8 (12.8) 60.4 (13.0) 62.8 (12.3) 60.2 (12.3) 0.146
 Male sex 2,338 (80.1) 1,581 (80.4) 452 (77.5) 305 (82.2) 0.168
Initial presentation
 Typical chest pain 2,715 (93.0) 1,827 (92.9) 543 (93.1) 345 (93.0) 0.985
 Off-hour admission 1,747 (59.8) 1,170 (59.5) 339 (58.1) 238 (64.2) 0.161
 Body weight (kg) 67.4 (12.2) 68.2 (12.4) 65.3 (11.2) 66.7 (12.6) < 0.001
 Symptom-to-door time (min) 125 (60–271) 130 (60–289) 120 (60–240) 109 (53–229) < 0.001
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 126.3 (30.8) 125.8 (30.2) 126.8 (30.8) 128.5 (33.6) 0.112
 Heart rate (beats/min) 76.5 (19.7) 76.2 (20.0) 76.1 (19.1) 78.4 (19.3) 0.116
 Killip class on admission
  I 2,342 (80.2) 1,549 (78.8) 475 (81.5) 318 (85.7) 0.006
  II 230 (7.9) 167 (8.5) 47 (8.1) 16 (4.3) 0.023
  III 136 (4.7) 100 (5.1) 23 (3.9) 13 (3.5) 0.274
  IV 212 (7.3) 150 (7.6) 38 (6.5) 24 (6.5) 0.543
 Anterior ST elevation or LBBB on electrocardiography 1,554 (53.2) 1,036 (52.7) 310 (53.2) 208 (56.1) 0.491
 Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 51.1 (9.7) 50.4 (9.3) 51.8 (10.2) 53.3 (10.7) < 0.001
Medical history
 Hypertension 1,228 (42.1) 814 (41.4) 253 (43.4) 161 (43.4) 0.593
 Diabetes mellitus 579 (19.8) 376 (19.1) 125 (21.4) 78 (21.0) 0.387
 Previous myocardial infarction or revascularization 224 (7.7) 157 (8.0) 48 (8.2) 19 (5.1) 0.139
 Angina pectoris 179 (6.1) 128 (6.5) 32 (5.5) 19 (5.1) 0.457
 Dyslipidemia 316 (10.8) 228 (11.6) 53 (9.1) 35 (9.4) 0.151
 Heart failure 19 (0.7) 14 (0.7) 1 (0.2) 4 (1.1) 0.198
 Cerebrovascular disease 124 (4.2) 87 (4.4) 25 (4.3) 12 (3.2) 0.579
 Current smoker 1,370 (46.9) 934 (47.5) 256 (43.9) 180 (48.5) 0.250
 Family history of premature coronary artery disease 198 (6.8) 133 (6.8) 35 (6.0) 30 (8.1) 0.459
Laboratory profiles
 White blood cell count (× 103/µL) 11.6 (4.2) 11.9 (4.1) 11.2 (4.6) 10.8 (3.6) < 0.001
 Hemoglobin level (g/dL) 14.4 (1.9) 14.4 (1.9) 14.2 (1.9) 14.5 (2.0) 0.821
 Glucose (mg/dL) 169.5 (69.2) 170.7 (68.4) 169.4 (69.4) 163.5 (73.1) 0.089
 eGFR (MDRD) (mL/min/1.73 m2) 91.2 (40.3) 91.6 (43.7) 88.8 (30.1) 93.2 (35.3) 0.970
 Peak troponin I (ng/mL) 81.1 (159.1) 93.5 (185.2) 64.4 (88.0) 45.9 (77.0) < 0.001
 Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 182.1 (43.6) 184.0 (43.7) 176.9 (41.8) 179.9 (45.1) 0.007
 Triglyceride (mg/dL) 142.2 (120.8) 144.6 (122.6) 133.6 (117.6) 142.9 (116.0) 0.344
 HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 43.0 (11.2) 42.9 (11.1) 42.9 (11.5) 43.3 (11.7) 0.644
 LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 114.8 (38.6) 116.1 (38.4) 111.9 (38.2) 112.4 (40.0) 0.026

Values are presented as mean (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), or number (%). Values for body weight are missing in 73 cases, systolic blood pressure in 6, heart rate in 6, left ventricular ejection fraction in 116, white blood cell count in 4, hemoglobin in 4, glucose in 118, creatinine in 4, peak troponin I in 404, total cholesterol in 92, triglyceride in 162, HDL-cholesterol in 143, and LDL-cholesterol in 311.

*

P-values are derived from the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, when appropriate, and from one-way analysis of variance F-test or Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables for between-group comparisons.

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LBBB, left bundle branch block; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TIMI, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction.

Table 2.

Angiographic and procedural characteristics and medical treatments according to preprocedural TIMI flow grades

Overall (n = 2,920) Preprocedural TIMI Flow 0 (n = 1,966) Preprocedural TIMI Flow 1 or 2 (n = 583) Preprocedural TIMI Flow 3 (n = 371) P value*
Angiographic findings
 Door-to-balloon time (min) 58 (46–72) 57 (45–72) 57 (46–70) 63 (51–78) < 0.001
 Transradial approach 689 (23.6) 451 (22.9) 129 (22.1) 109 (29.4) 0.018
 Culprit lesion
  Left anterior descending artery 1,663 (57.0) 1,061 (54.0) 359 (61.6) 243 (65.5) < 0.001
  Left circumflex artery 252 (8.6) 164 (8.3) 53 (9.1) 35 (9.4) 0.716
  Right coronary artery 1,005 (34.4) 741 (37.7) 171 (29.3) 93 (25.1) < 0.001
 ACC/AHA lesion type B2/C 2,565 (87.8) 1,793 (91.2) 481 (82.5) 291 (78.4) < 0.001
 Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use 678 (23.2) 537 (27.3) 92 (15.8) 49 (13.2) < 0.001
 Thrombus aspiration 1,192 (40.8) 954 (48.5) 159 (27.3) 79 (21.3) < 0.001
 Stenting 2,727 (93.4) 1,810 (92.1) 561 (96.2) 356 (96.0) < 0.001
 Drug-eluting stents 2,620 (90.4) 1,739 (89.3) 540 (92.9) 341 (92.4) 0.013
 Postprocedural TIMI flow
  0 6 (0.2) 5 (0.3) 1 (0.2) 0 (0) 0.599
  1 13 (0.4) 13 (0.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.042
  2 102 (3.5) 90 (4.6) 12 (2.1) 0 (0) < 0.001
  3 2,799 (95.9) 1,858 (94.5) 570 (97.8) 371 (100.0) < 0.001
 Successful PCI 2,883 (98.7) 1,935 (98.4) 581 (99.7) 367 (98.9) 0.061
 Intravascular ultrasound during PCI 513 (17.6) 332 (16.9) 105 (18.0) 76 (20.5) 0.236
 Optical coherence tomography during PCI 61 (2.1) 37 (1.9) 9 (1.5) 15 (4.0) 0.017
Medications at discharge
 Aspirin 2,916 (99.9) 1,962 (99.8) 583 (100.0) 371 (100.0) 0.378
 P2Y12 inhibitor 2,848 (97.5) 1,913 (97.3) 572 (98.1) 363 (97.8) 0.498
  Clopidogrel 1,786 (61.2) 1,186 (60.3) 377 (64.7) 223 (60.1) 0.152
  Potent P2Y12 inhibitor 1,062 (36.4) 727 (37.0) 195 (33.4) 140 (37.7) 0.251
 Beta-blocker 2,509 (85.9) 1,677 (85.3) 504 (86.4) 328 (88.4) 0.264
 ACEi or ARB 2,335 (80.0) 1,570 (79.9) 477 (81.8) 288 (77.6) 0.282
 Statin 2,713 (92.9) 1,820 (92.6) 545 (93.5) 348 (93.8) 0.585
 Statin intensity
  High 919 (31.5) 632 (32.1) 164 (28.1) 123 (33.2) 0.141
  Moderate 1,740 (59.6) 1,153 (58.6) 365 (62.6) 222 (59.8) 0.230
  Low 54 (1.8) 35 (1.8) 16 (2.7) 3 (0.8) 0.089
 Oral anticoagulant 105 (3.6) 81 (4.1) 13 (2.2) 11 (3.0) 0.077

Values are presented as mean (SD), median (interquartile range), or number (%).

*

P-values are derived from the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, when appropriate, and from one-way analysis of variance F-test or Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables for between-group comparisons. Values are missing in 1 case and 23 cases, and they are excluded from percentage calculations.

ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. Other abbreviations as in Table 1.

Table 3.

Clinical outcomes during 3 years according to preprocedural TIMI flow grades

Overall (n = 2,920) Preprocedural TIMI Flow 0 (n = 1,966) Preprocedural TIMI Flow 1 or 2 (n = 583) Preprocedural TIMI Flow 3 (n = 371) P value*
In-hospital mortality 89 (3.0) 62 (3.2) 17 (2.9) 10 (2.7) 0.876
180-day outcomes
 Total deaths 131 (4.5) 95 (4.8) 21 (3.6) 15 (4.0) 0.410
  Cardiac death 109 (3.7) 81 (4.1) 15 (2.6) 13 (3.5) 0.217
  Non-cardiac death 22 (0.8) 14 (0.7) 6 (1.0) 2 (0.5) 0.649
 Myocardial infarction 23 (0.8) 16 (0.8) 5 (0.9) 2 (0.5) 0.841
 Percutaneous coronary intervention 23 (0.8) 15 (0.8) 5 (0.9) 3 (0.8) 0.973
 Coronary artery bypass grafting 2 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3) 0.262
 Cerebrovascular accidents 13 (0.4) 10 (0.5) 1 (0.2) 2 (0.5) 0.539
 Composite major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events 179 (6.1) 127 (6.5) 30 (5.1) 22 (5.9) 0.502
3-year outcomes
 Total deaths 228 (7.8) 160 (8.1) 46 (7.9) 22 (5.9) 0.346
  Cardiac death 160 (5.5) 116 (5.9) 28 (4.8) 16 (4.3) 0.339
  Non-cardiac death 68 (2.3) 44 (2.2) 18 (3.1) 6 (1.6) 0.305
 Myocardial infarction 54 (1.8) 34 (1.7) 16 (2.7) 4 (1.1) 0.139
 Percutaneous coronary intervention 134 (4.6) 85 (4.3) 28 (4.8) 21 (5.7) 0.509
 Coronary artery bypass grafting 4 (0.1) 3 (0.2) 0 (0) 1 (0.3) 0.519
 Cerebrovascular accidents 57 (2.0) 39 (2.0) 10 (1.7) 8 (2.2) 0.877
 Composite major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events 416 (14.2) 277 (14.1) 88 (15.1) 51 (13.7) 0.795

Values are presented as number (%).

*

The P-values are derived from the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, when appropriate, for between-group comparisons. Abbreviations as in Table 1.